Multinational enterprises (MNEs) often segregate their business operations into several functional elements that, in combination, form an end-to-end supply and value chain. Since the current international tax regime is based on the separate entity approach, every entity within an MNE should be adequately remunerated for functions, assets, and risks that it contributes to the value chain. When doing transfer pricing analysis, we identify economically important functions, assets, and risks, and draw conclusions about (1) the primary role of controlled transaction participants, and (2) the degree of "complexity" of the role they play. The process of labelling entities with high-level "tags" is known as entity characterisation, and these "tags" are sometimes called functional profiles. The key purpose of the exercise is to understand the allocation of risk between the companies - in other words, how the business risks are allocated in the value chain. This also helps to determine transfer prices or margins (such as operating profit margins) in transfer pricing arrangements. 

If you are going to take the ADIT transfer pricing exam, you also need to bear in mind that entity characterisation is included in syllabus ("Functional analysis" module). Therefore, knowing the main functional profiles and the approach to entity characterisation is crucial for the successful exam sitting.

Let's assume that during functional analysis, we identified that one party of the transaction is responsible for the manufacturing of products. The manufacturer buys raw materials and takes title to finished goods. The company does not own unique and valuable intangibles, and only uses routine manufacturing know-how and technologies that are widely available in this industry. The manufacturer produces goods on request of the principal, and the principal guarantees to purchase ordered goods from the manufacturer (if they meet quality standards). Based on these facts, we can conclude that the company can be characterised as a contract manufacturer.

Knowing transfer pricing methods and approaches to comparability analysis, we can assume that the contract manufacturer will be selected as a tested party. There is a good chance of using the Transactional net margin method (TNMM) and testing the remuneration of the contract manufacturer on a cost-plus basis (if internal comparables are not available).

 Typical entities in manufacturing are:

•  Toll manufacturers - entities that processes raw materials or semi-finished goods for another company. Essentially, a toll manufacturer provides the service to the principal without taking title to the raw materials or final products.

•  Contract manufacturers - similar to a toll manufacturer, a contract manufacturer executes manufacturing functions for a principal. However, contrary to a toll manufacturer, a contract manufacturer takes title to the raw materials and finished products. Provided it meets specified quality and quantity, a principal will guarantee to buy all the goods manufactured.

•  Fully-fledged manufacturers - a fully-fledged manufacturer executes all important manufacturing functions and bears associated risks. It usually engages in production planning, sourcing and procuring inputs, R&D activities, design and engineering, quality control, and logistics. A fully-fledged manufacturer assumes the market risk, inventory risk, R&D risk, product liability risk, and other risks depending on the MNE structure.
 

In distribution:
 

•  Commission agents and commissionaires - they do not usually purchase products and resell to the customer, but instead operate as sale representatives and receive a commission on the sales to customers (the commission is often calculated as a percentage of the price paid by the customer). An agent is responsible for interaction with the customers and facilitates sales, but the terms of the sale and the contract for sale itself are agreed upon and concluded by the principal. An agent does not take title to the products and therefore incurs minimal risks. While a distributor reports revenue as the amount of the product sold to customers, an agent generally reports income as the amount of commission received from the supplier, which is often a small fraction of the third-party sales.

•  Limited risk distributors - a Limited-Risk Distributor (LRD) is a distribution company that buys goods and markets them to customers. LRDs can sometimes contribute to marketing activities. The arrangement between the distributor and principal significantly limits LRD risks. Risks relating to inventory and debtors will be effectively controlled and covered by the principal. For example, the obsolete stock will be bought back, bad debts will be reimbursed, etc. The market risk will also be limited for the LRD. Such a distributor typically does not develop significant marketing intangibles. The material difference between an agent and the LRD is that the LRD takes the title of the product, which leads to more significant functions and risks compared with an agent. However, these functions and risks are still limited. The LRD would usually earn limited profit measured as a return on sales (margin).

•  Fully-fledged distributors - a Fully-Fledged Distributor (FFD) undertakes all of the sales and distribution functions, performs marketing activities and bears all of the material risks relevant to these functions. It buys, holds, and sells products, develops necessary intangibles, and has significant downside risks, as well as receiving upside results of positive outcomes of its activity. The FFD usually incurs material costs to execute its functions and is often entitled to residual profit. 

 
Service providers:

•  Low value-adding service providers

•  Classic contract service providers

•  Sophisticated service providers